Sign in Subscribe
Digital Signs

Static versus Digital: Why Digital Billboards are a Clear Winner

Matt Lasker

Matt Lasker

— 2 min read
Share
Static versus Digital: Why Digital Billboards are a Clear Winner

Most operators point to the build cost when explaining why they haven’t gone digital. The upfront investment is higher. But on the right location, the additional cash flow more than offsets it. The numbers make that clear.

Why Digital Wins on Operations

With static, one face supports one advertiser. Revenue is capped by what a single business is willing to pay for long-term exposure. Digital removes that ceiling. One digital can host multiple advertisers at once, turning what was one revenue stream into several. Instead of selling the entire face to one client, the location is monetized across a mix of campaigns at different price points.

Creative can also be changed instantly, allowing advertisers to run short-term promotions, seasonal offers, or test campaigns. These types of campaigns rarely justify a full static buy, but they fit naturally into digital inventory. As a result, the same location captures revenue that static simply wouldn't have. Digital also allows advertisers to refresh messaging throughout the year. Instead of committing to one creative for months, they can rotate promotions and align campaigns with business cycles. That makes the medium more attractive and increases demand for available slots.

Digital Creates 10× the Cash Flow

Let's model a real comparison using market rates in my area.

Assumptions:

  • Static: 2 faces, $1,100 per face per 4 weeks, 80% occupancy, $60,000 build cost
  • Digital: 20 ad slots, $1,000 per slot per 4 weeks, 70% occupancy, $300,000 build cost
  • Expenses: Both have 10% sales commission, 5% maintenance, 3% utilities; static pays 20% ground lease on revenue, digital pays $10,000 flat
Table 1: Annual Operating Performance

Digital generates $139,240 in annual BCF versus $14,186 for static— nearly 10× the cash flow on 5× the build cost. That translates to double the ROI (46.4% vs 23.6%) and half the payback period.

Value Creation with Digital

Assuming a 6x BCF multiple for the static and 8x BCF for the digital, the value creation is huge on digitals:

Table 2: Asset Value at Exit

Keep in mind we used very conservative BCF multiples. For a larger plant, the digital can command 10-14x BCF and static 6-8x. The digital value gap only gets wider. After subtracting the build cost, digital creates $813,920 in net value versus $25,114 for static—a $788,806 premium. That extra quarter-million in upfront capex buys you three-quarters of a million in asset value at exit.

You can subscribe for free by entering your email below. Our newsletter is free.

Read more